Nikita Kriulov

Picture of Nikita Kriulov

Date of Birth: 1807

Age: 73

Place of Birth: County Poshehonsky

Citizenship: Russia


Here he found his challenge compartment II His Imperial Majesty`s Own Chancellery (1829), which concerned was then preparing young people to engage in legal departments in universities. Under the leadership of Count MM Speranskii Krylov began his legal education. In 1831 Krylov was sent abroad, where he listened to celebrities of the time (Savigny, Eichhorn, Hans et al.). In 1835 Krylov, returning from abroad, stood the doctor`s exam and took in the Moscow University Department of Roman law, which left in 1872. As a lecturer Krylov had a rare, outstanding talent. Listeners it left the audience under the spell of genuine admiration, and with the memory of professor in their whole life was connected memory of mental stimulation, the development that took place under the influence of his lectures. World Krylov possess breadth, which never allows him to settle down at the simple contemplation of phenomena. Each individual phenomenon appeared to him in a complex set of relationships, close and distant, it served as an echo of something more general and big. He brought together the items to be completely dissimilar, and in the most dry and privacy is a source for ideas with a common value. The course of Roman law became so general education courses for lawyers. Krylov`s course had the character of philosophical reflection on the Roman law. High readings dignity Krylov was a role he assigned the directions of psychological properties. Most observation and close, direct acquaintance with human nature, with its passions and desires, with the strengths and weaknesses of the human soul discovered a rich source for the characterization of historical phenomena. In the historical story, dedicated to the presentation of consistent growth of Roman law, Krylov listener received no list of events from it, more or less skillfully drawn, but was present at the whole process of gradual development and creation of a Roman citizen, in all its historical positions. In the history of the state and law was clarified man who created it. The aggregate effects of each period has been generalized to the typical features of the then social system; especially the latter, in turn, reduced to the nature of identity, operated in this period. The extraordinary plasticity of language made accessible lectures Krylova and unelected listeners. The happy combination of depth of thought with its transmission and plasticity should look for the source of the mighty forces Krylov as a professor. Mental, moral, political state of society, outlined in a number of individual provisions, sometimes in the form of anecdotal; deep-seated psychic phenomena engine, often passed language drama; the root meaning of a legal definition or institution, the spitting image of the characteristic in the incident; bold and brilliant analogy, designed to determine the most human side of the subject; sharp and no less brilliant antithesis, the use of national transmission and time of its features: a strong, healthy humor, sometimes reaching up to the label of satire; as a result of the reduction of the above to the general principles expressed in the abstract, and certainly correctly separated and located - this sketch of a conventional system lectures Krylov. He was professor and artist. Print art lying on his lectures, and he knew how to pronounce them with the fullness and clarity, which proclaimed him the presence of the extraordinary liveliness of the imagination. - According to its scientific views on the right wing it was a brilliant exponent of the historical school of jurisprudence. Course its Krylov never printed. The weight of student publications of his lectures no, that would reproduced with complete accuracy the plastic force of his speech. Printed monographs Krylov also did not leave. Two of his works printed - accidental origin: a speech delivered June 11, 1838 in the auditorium of the University of Moscow meeting: "On the historical significance of Roman law" and a critical article about the labor BN Chicherin.